Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'-- <br /> <br />'-- <br /> <br />'--' <br /> <br />the Master Plan and make a recommendation to the Board of Zoning Appeals to that <br /> <br />effect. William Abbott seconded the motion and the Board unanimously passed the <br /> <br />same. <br /> <br />The next item of business on the agenda was the lawsuit pending against <br /> <br />Ray Hatmaker. The Board's Attorney advised that he now has a default judgment <br /> <br />entry against Mr. Hatmaker and that the injunction in effect reads that all <br /> <br />business uses shall cease on the property and violations shall be taken care of <br /> <br />immediately. The Board's Attorney also advised that he had heard that Mr. <br /> <br />Hatmaker was in the hospital at this time and would be physically unable to do <br /> <br />some of the work as necessitated by the order for a period of time. Attorney <br /> <br />Currens also advised that he had sent a red tag on the mini-barn which was <br /> <br />built on the property without a permit at the request of Building Inspector Beikman. <br /> <br />As of yet no return receipt had been received on this certified letter. <br /> <br />The next item to come before the Board was the hearing on the unsafe building <br /> <br />code violation of Jerry K. Graybill regarding the property located at 129 E. High <br /> <br />Street. Mr. Graybill was present and acknowledge receipt of the Notice of Order <br /> <br />setting this matter for a hearing September 26, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. Mr. Graybill <br /> <br />explained that he thought the property had been secured and he had purchased <br /> <br />materials to do the same. He then advised that he had had problems with the <br /> <br />man doing the work who was now working full-time and not getting much of the <br /> <br />work done. He also advised that materials had been stolen and he had suffered <br /> <br />problems with break-ins. He had present with him a Mr. Young who helped deliver <br /> <br />the materials and do some of the work. He felt that in the near future a lot <br /> <br />of the work could be taken care of. Attorney Currens then interjected to explain <br /> <br />the legal process which must be followed under the unsafe building ordinance. In <br /> <br />particular he advised that the notice set this matter for a hearing and the Board <br /> <br />could either proceed with the hearing or continue the same. Mr. Currens then asked <br /> <br />Mr. Graybill if he, in effect, was requesting a continuance of this matter. Mr. <br /> <br />-2- <br />