Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />,.. <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Mr. Lawson indicated he had received a call from Mr. David Kingen <br />who was to appear before the Board and present his written proposal <br />to the Plan Commission for its consideration in professional services <br />for implementing the Buffer Zone. Mr. Lawson indicated that Mr. <br />Kingen had been on vacation for two weeks and had not had sufficient <br />time to prepare his proposal. Mr. Lawson advised that Mr. Kingen <br />indicated he would be present at the next Board Meeting to present <br />the same. <br /> <br />Mr. Edwards reported that he had talked with Mr. Bain in regards <br />to his property and the violation letter that had been sent to this <br />property owner. Mr. Bain had indicated that he had turned the <br />matter over to Attorney Ralph Lett and that he thought that in the <br />very near future a petition for variance would be filed before the <br />Board of Zoning Appeals. The Plan Commission tabled any further <br />action concerning this violation to give the property owner <br />sufficient time to file his petition for variance. <br /> <br />The Board then discussed in further detail the proposal in regards <br />to off-street parking that had been presented by Board Member, <br />George Smi th. An exchange 0 f ideas was had. Mr. Smi th, in the <br />coming months, is to draft a proposed change in the existing master <br />plan zoning ordinance and the sub-division control ordinance for <br />the Board's consideration, moving towards presenting such an <br />amendment to the Board of Trustees for amendment to both zoning <br />regulations. <br /> <br />Mr. Abbott discussed with the Board a building application that <br />had been made by Mr. Hatton on South Street. After discussion of <br />the application, it was determined by the Board Members that the <br />Technical Committee had acted properly in not approving the <br />construction of the proposed building on the lot. It was felt <br />that a variance would have to be obtained by the property owner <br />in completing this building and that (1) it would be in the nature <br />of a business building in a residential zone and (2) it would be <br />an accessory building built on the lot prior to the erection of <br />a principal building. The Plan Commission's determination or <br />position was to be relayed to the property owner. <br /> <br />There being no further business to come before the Board, upon <br />motion duly made and seconded, the meeting was adjourned. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />President <br />