MINUTES 1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r , I f i' MOORESVILLE PLAN COMMISSION Stated Meeting of October 15, 1973 The Mooresville Plan Commission met in regular session on Monday, October 15, 1973 at 7:30 P.M. Those members present were Mr. Steve Edwards, Mr. Henry Gajderowicz, Mr. Rich Keller, and Mr. Bart Hensley. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Mr. Steve Edwards. The minutes of the last meeting were not read by reason of the absence of the Board's secretary, Mrs. Eweather J. Stephens. In absence of the secretary, the Chairman requested that Mr. Henry Gajderowicz record the minutes of the meeting. There was no old business to come before the Board. { Thereafter, the Board heard the following petitions for rezoning: 1. Petition No. .y ,1973 by Benjamin R. Mendenhall. Petitioner was represented by Attorney John Mills. It was noted by the Board's attorney, David E. Lawson, that the notice of the hearing for rezoning had been published as coming before the Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals. It was the opinion of the attorney that whereas the time and place of the hearing for rezoning was correct and that upon repre- sentation of Mr. Mills, that the certified letters which had been sent to adjoining land owners indicated that the petition was one for re- zoning from residential to general business that the Board could waive this defect. On motion duly made by Mr. Henry Gajderowicz and seconded by Mr. Bart Hensley and unanimously carried, the Board agreed to pro- ceed with the hearing on the merits of the Mendenhall petition. Evidence was presented by the petitioner and his counsel; there were no remonstrators appearing opposing this rezoning. Mr. Rich KEller moved that the Mooresville Plan Commission recommend approval to the Town Board of the rezoning as requested in the petition which was seconded by Mr. Henry Gajderowicz and unanimously approved by all commission members present. 2. Petition No. # J , 1973 by Harold W. and Carolyn A. Estes. Petitioners were represented by Attorney Steven Harris. The petitioner moved to amend their petition of rezoning from a single family to general business rather than industrial. The amend- ment was premitted as the request for general business is a lessor classification than the request of Industrial. The petition was presented by Attorney Harris and the property owner Ha ro 1 d W. Es tes . No adjoining property owners appeered to remonstrate, however, Mr. Richard Squire, whose mother owns property in the area appeared and was heard. Mr. Squire indicated that he thought the situation ,-- would be better handled by a variance rather than rezoning although,