My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SEPTEMBER 25, 2003
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
SEPTEMBER 25, 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:13:57 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 11:50:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Commission
NAME
SEPTEMBER 25, 2003
Plan Commission - Type
Minutes
DATE
2003-09-25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />There is the American Legion Building, a house, a parking lot across from Casey's, and <br />on the other side Automotive Armature. The house was turned down for rezone because <br />the lot was too small. The entire area there was not done as a unit and now you have a <br />house stuck with residential zoning in the middle. Where is that different than what has <br />been discussed on South Street. Attorney Currens said if they change to the transition of <br />that area to other uses will happen in an orderly fashion, it will give them flexibility. <br /> <br />Commissioner Crouch had the members look at page 25, East District-second paragraph. <br />The triangle at Old 67 and New 67 best suited for general business and industrial uses. <br />But in next sentence it says however, existing residential neighborhoods are well <br />established and make new industrial uses inappropriate. Attorney Tim Currens said he <br />thought what they were saying was, inappropriate without appropriate buffering. He said <br />that Marley Woods and Charmil are nice additions but in the wrong spot, both are on four <br />lane highways. But since they are there, then what needs to be looked at is how we blend <br />in for future growth to these areas. We are really trying to find a way to develop with <br />appropriate buffering and compatibility. <br /> <br />Commissioner Crouch wanted the commission to look at page 26-East District-paragraph <br />2. He said it says rolling land best suited for low-density residential. Does that mean the <br />property on # 144 past the trailer court that has been for sale for a long time if somebody <br />would come in and say they want to put in shopping area and high density housing in the <br />back they would be turned down. Commissioner Bruner told him it doesn't say Highway <br />144, it says East District and #144 was an exception. Commissioner Crouch said if <br />someone came in to put apartments on that land on #144, would that get approved. He <br />said no particular areas had been set aside for apartment zoning. <br /> <br />Commissioner Crouch said on page 28-Industrial-bottom paragraph- second and third <br />sentences- these areas are most intensive land uses and should be located away from <br />residential use, he thinks the word buffer should be there. Attorney Tim Currens said <br />buffering is already in the ordinance because the ordinance states distance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Crouch said the last page he wanted to discuss was page 29-in the first <br />sentence, the word "moist" should be "the most". And in the same paragraph, the last <br />sentence, what does additional buffering mean? Attorney Tim Currens said he thought <br />the word "additional" could be deleted because the buffering is set by ordinance <br />standards. <br /> <br />Commissioner Crouch said in 1-4 it states this classification has to have extensive <br />buffering. If you are in a business park, what is the difference? Attorney Tim Currens <br />said because it is a planned unit development and buffering requirements are really set by <br />the ordinance. He said this statement emphasizes our ordinance has buffering <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Williamson asked what they were going to do about setbacks on roads. <br />Town attorney Tim Currens said this needs to be done with a thoroughfare plan and <br />needs to be done in a separate ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.