My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FEB. 21, 1990
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
FEB. 21, 1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:14 AM
Creation date
4/15/2003 9:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
1990-02-21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF MOORESVILLE <br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br /> <br /> The Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals met at its regularly <br />scheduled meeting place, the Town Hall, on February 21, 1990, at <br />7:00 p.m. Present were Board Members Vern Kimmel, Robert Tucker, <br />Don Barry, and Alan Kramer. The meeting was called to order by <br />Chairman Barry who determined a quorum was present and the Board <br />proceeded to approval of the minutes of the prior meeting and <br />findings of fact. <br /> <br /> The first item on the agenda was the variance request from <br />Dale and Matilda Jessup for the property located at 227 W. Main <br />Street, Mooresville, Indiana. The Jessups were requesting a <br />variance from the use to allow this property to be used for a two <br />family residence. Paul Bryant was present with petitioner, <br />Matilda Jessup, and explained to the Board that this property <br />originally was set up for two separate family units. He advised <br />that the Jessups had remodeled the interior and planned to do <br />extensive work on the exterior of the property. <br />advised that two single ladies would be living <br />one in each of the units. Chairman Barry then <br />not there were any other parties present for or against the <br />petition. Receiving no response, the Board proceeded to findings <br />of fact based upon the variance of use. The Board found the <br />following: <br /> <br /> 1. The approval would not injurious to the public health, <br /> safety, morals and general welfare of the community due to <br /> <br /> He further <br /> <br />at the residence, <br />inquired whether or <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.