NOV. 15, 2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MOO1LES~.rlLL~E BO;a2RD OF ZO?Cfi~'G Wednesday, November 15, 2000 '[he Moores~.qA!e Board of Zo~fiag Appeals met on Wednesday, November 15,2000 for their re~lar meetLng. Board members present were Alan Kramer, Donald Ban?' and Mike Yramg ~56t Jeff Jusms being absent. Also present was Thn Cnn'cas To~m att,:mey. The meetng was called to onier by Chakxnan ~Man Krmner. Chahauan !s~'amer asked for motion on the n~mtes for October 18, 2000. Donald Ban? reopened to approve the ndnutes as naStten the second was from 5~:e Yomtg, modon to accept m~utes as n~tten passed The Fn'st request before the board was Sign Variance by Bmmhtg Engh~ee~Sng for Moores~4~e Par~ers. jeffBam~g presented to request was to replace the si~ a~ th~ C~mer of Bdd~e Sa'eet and State Road 67. The si~ n~ be 373 square feet h* size, the heist wo~d b~ 40 feet. 7he setbacks wo~d be 23 feet from Bridge Sa'eeL closer then the re,fluted 60 feet, the si~t would also be S8 feet from State ~oad 67 width ~ 2 feet rinser th~n 60 feet. There were no ques~ns from &e Board. Chares McQ~re of 577 Be~el Road if they were replacing 8ae temporat? flint is fl~ere now. 5~h'. B~hg answered was. Chaimmn ~'amer read fi~e Yh~dhtgs o[ Fact for a variance from devetvpmeut standards. ~.5~ no od~er qaesfiom Chainnan $~mer asked for a motion on 8~e vmiance, Pouald gm~' mofioued to ~'ant ~e ~adance ~5{}~ M~ke Yomtg offet~tg rite second, motion caused 3-0 wi*h nm~e opposed. The next ~tem of the agenda was Dax4d Huffam and Ryan Gddmeyer from C S 0 representh~g Moores-dlle Parmers asklag fo.-,.' 5 variances on the Fields Crosshtg pr,~ject. The vat,dace were as k~llows. 1: h~crease allowable btdld~g heigitt fre~m ate required 35 feet to 4~ feet 4 h~ches. 2: }J~crease allow~d~le s[guage per b~.d~g face from 400 square feet to 466 square t~et~ 5: tnrrease a~owable pylon si~ height karo ~5 feet to 15 feet 4: Decrease all,wable pykm si~ setback from 60 feet to 1~ feet along Bridge Sa'eet. 5: Decrease aHowabte pylon s~ set~ack fi'om 60 feet to ~ feet along State Rand 67. It was e~lah~ea the vmiance for height was just far ~e Center or the eawance of the g~aa~g. ~'~. Ban3' asked~ why &ey were asking for 5 feet on fi~e State Rand 67 when WalGreens and ViSage Panty-were ~-an¢ed a l~-foo¢ variance, ~'. Gotdberg answered ~at it was for ~ibffiU. 5~', Yo'~g asked if ~e si~ts had k~temal !igh~g, ~'. Haffam' s answer was yes, ~at &ey wo~d be. ~h', Ban5' asked ~.~. Bam~ if the set backs were karo fl~e pre'posed ~provements along Bridge Sa'eet, 5k. Bam&~g said that yes fitat fids