Laserfiche WebLink
~~ <br />~~ <br />June 7, 2005 <br />The Mooresville Town Council met in regular session on Tuesday, June 7, 2005 at 6:30 <br />P.M. at the Mooresville Town Hall. <br />Town Council members present were: President, Tom Worthen, Toby Dolen, John L. <br />Clark and Eric Shields. Councilman Troy Bryant was absent. Town attorney, Tim <br />Currens was present. <br />Gene Deverick of Grace Church gave the prayer. <br />A motion was made by Councilman Clark, second by Councilman Dolen to approve the <br />minutes of the May 17, 2005 meeting. Motion carried 4-0. <br />The first item on the agenda was the opening of the bids for the reworking of the <br />Wastewater Treatment Plant. Chris Gale, from HNTB, who wrote the specifications far <br />the bids, was present. There were five bids turned in. Chris Gale has provided the Tawn <br />with a bid tabulation sheet, which shows the name and address of each company who bid, <br />as well as the breakdown of their bids, with the lump sum base bid and mandatory <br />alternates 1 thru 4. It will be attached to these minutes for review. Chris Gale explained <br />the mandatory alternates to the Council. He stated that the project contains a sludge <br />thickening building which is designed to have redundant systems to thicken the sludge, <br />pump it to and from the thickener and add chemicals. Because of the town's limited <br />funds for the project, the option they chose was to have the mandatory alternates. <br />Alternates number one and two are pumps, three is the chemical feed equipment and four <br />is the rotary drum thickener. The equipment is in place to treat the sludge and <br />wastewater without any of the mandatory alternates, it will just have to work harder than <br />it would if it had the redundant system alongside. If the rotary drum thickener or one of <br />the pumps goes out of service we would not be able to thicken sludge until they were <br />fixed, whereas if the redundant equipment was in place, it would still be in operation. It <br />is not something that would keep the town from meeting permit limits unless it wasn't <br />fixed for a long time, however treatment plants and collection systems are typically <br />designed to have the redundant systems in place for down time during cleaning yr <br />servicing. The Town can move forward with any number of those alternates in place and <br />the contract can be awarded an any combination of the lump sum base bid or the lump <br />sum base bid plus one or more of the mandatory alternates. President Worthen <br />recommended that the Council take the bids under advisement, give Chris Gale and Dan <br />Tingle time to look the bids aver and possibly award the bid at the next council meeting. <br />Chris Gale said that would give hirn sufficient time to review them. <br />Councilman Dolen made a motion to take the bids under advisement. Motion was second <br />by Councilman Clark and carried 4-0. <br />Susan Crouch, who lives at 545 N. Indiana Street, was present to ask the Council not to <br />lower the speed limit an Indiana Street from Main Street to County Line Road to 20 mph <br />from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. She stated that traffic is already congested on Indiana Street <br />to the point that she has a hard time leaving her home and that this would only make it <br />worse. Tim Currens stated that Police Chief, Tim Viles had already met with him on this <br />issue and had similar concerns as Susan and that before an ordinance could be passed and <br />enforced, a study needed to be done. He stated that this should be coordinated with the <br />school, to establish where and how many students are crossing the streets on the way to <br />school and develop a plan to direct them to specific areas where crossing guards would <br />be present and then determine the time period and area for the 20 mph zone. Tim Viles is <br />getting with the school on that and also planzung to have the police department to be <br />more involved in the process of selecting the crossing guards and providing them with <br />some formal training. Susan stated that in reverting to her "judge rate" she would like to <br />point out that it is much less confusing for everybody if the specific hours of enforcement <br />are posted instead of just saying "when children are present". She has had people come <br />in with tickets who did not know they were in a school zone because the blinker light <br />wasn't working and they thought that indicated when children were present. She also <br />raised the question if the hours were posted as 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. would that also <br />mean all summer long? As recommended by Tim Currens, this will come back for <br />discussion after the study has been done. <br />