TC 2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

could restrict so the access was not used for agriculture trucKs. t'resiaent wazttien commented his concerns were with property values, would this adversely affect, and the public safety and welfare of the adjoining properties. Mr. Holloway said the property was zoned agriculture now. They are going to build one home on Lot #l. We are not apposed to putting restrictions on Lot 1 and Lot 2. President Wartheat said without sewer and under Agriculture zoning there could be 15 one-acre lots. Mr. Holloway said if this was rezoned to R1A and with. sewer. there could possibly be 50 to 60 homes on 16,000 square foot lots. Councilman Clark asked if they were willing to annex both, lots into Town. Mr.1"Iolloway said yes, they would even be willing to annex the strip that is called the access and utility easement also and it could be .ran clear to the north end of Lot 2 if the Town so desires. These people want sanitary sewers for their home. Mr. Holloway said due to a family situation~they want to move from Roberson Woods and _ build a home on Lot 1 sv they can be close to the zest of their family. They understand that any further division of Lot 1 or Lot 2 they would have to go back to the Plan Couunissioti and go thru the process. They would have a private drive out thru the easement to the end of Sugarberry Court. Mr,1"lolloway said the easement is fifty foot wide like Sugarberry and someday when developed they could dedicate that strip to the Tawn, so the Town would be guaranteed dais would be a Town standard street. President Worthen asked if they would agree to building caveziants acid restrictions of Roberson d have to check with Mr. Fox and get back to the couoo s. Mr: Ho oway sal e wou - -- __- _.__. ncil. President Worthen said with possible extension of this road to Allison Road and ~~~~ -- possibly being dedicated to the Town, his concern was the gravel driveway meeting a Tawn street. Mr. Holloway said maybe they could pave at least 50 feet or they may plan on having ari asphalt drive, he didn't really know for sure. We could say there would be an asphalt drive; that entire portion that is within the access and utility easement and that would keep gravel being tracked onto Sugarberry. President Worthen said, as far as he was concerned, if you could extend Sugarberry in a mangier that we can accept that as a road when it is done, or continue the road on out and the language would also cover size and construction of the homes equal. to or greater than Roberson Woods, l don't have a problem with thaC. Mr. Holloway said he thought this was excessive to request. He doesn't think they would have a problem with saying they would pave afour-inch thick asphalt driveway for twelve or fourteen feet. But his guess was when the rest of George Fox's property develops, somewhere just beyond where the street ends now there might be storm. inlets or there will be changes in grade or something to accommodate the street as it goes on out into his property, so whatever we do now would be second guessing what happens wheia the property develops. President Wartben said with Rule 13, this would be considered a blacktop surface with no storm-water handling. Nlr. Holloway said this would be addressed when plans were broughC in to the Town. When in the future this is extended, we don't mind dedicating the street to the Town. Attorney Currens said they are asking for a driveway permit, not any kind of dedication. Attorney Currens advised the council to wait on any dedications because then it was theirs to improve and wait until it was decided to develop and they would have to meet the standards of the Town of Mooresville otherwise the Town is stuck with road improvement or asking them to do it on Town property. At this point Councilman Clark made a motion to approve driveway access with stipulation of paving the driveway and construction of homes equal to or greater than Roberson Woods. No second because Dave Stegman, Roberson Woods Homeowners Association, asked to speak. 'The association objects to this access due to concerns with a freeway running thru their. subdivision, children on bicycles, and with drainage issues. The association wants to be assured this driveway would end here. He asked Mr. Holloway if he would consider access from Allison Road. kie said there was no law against one entry to a subdivision. President Worthen said that by doing what he is asking tonight might stop Sugarberry from ever going thru. Mr. Holloway said he did isot know if the Fox family wants homes around them. He said he thought for safety and for fire purposes there should not be just one access. Michael Wilson, 1340 Sugarberry Court, spoke to the council about his lots 91 and 92. He said the edge of his lot sits three and one-half feet above the property in question up against a fence. He is concerned about the drainage. He said there was no open end and water went to floe fence. There is no ditch or swale, it just goes out thru the field and kae wanted to know how the two lots would be joined. There is a creek sixty feet away but water doeszi't run to the creek. is drainage from Lot 2 going to flow on the driveway? President Worthen said this Lot l has the discharge area and they cannot do anything with the discharge area. Mr. Holloway answered that is correct. He said they would take the ravine and put a drainage easement across it so it can't be built in and this would probably be required with the building plans. You can put a driveway across the easement; you just can't block the flow. A motion was made by Councilman Clark, with a second by Councilman Dolen to approve the driveway entrance from Sugarberry subject to posting a bond, paving the