Laserfiche WebLink
3. That the establishment of the Special Exception would not <br />impede or substantially alter the normal and orderly development <br />and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the <br />district since this use has been a continued use for several <br />years. <br /> <br /> 4. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other <br />necessary facilities have been or are being provided by the Town <br />and that this would not have a sufficient impact on any of those <br />to prohibit the proposed use. <br /> <br /> 5. That adequate measures have been taken to provide ingress <br />and egress so designated as to minimize traffic congestion on the <br />public roads and that the proposed parking lot expansion and <br />distribution of traffic was sufficient. <br /> <br /> 6. That the Special Exception would be located in a district <br />where such use is permitted and all other requirements in this <br />Ordinance which are applicable to such Special Exception would be <br />met. <br /> <br /> The Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals having heard evidence <br />on the above captioned petition now makes the following findings <br />of fact under the development standards for the variance from the <br />setback on the side setbacks from 12 feet to 3.6 feet and 12 feet <br />to 6.6 feet on the east property line, along with front setback of <br />60 feet to 31.5 feet, pursuant to I.C. 36-7-4-9-18.5: <br /> <br /> 1. The setbacks, as proposed, would not be injurious to the <br />public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the <br />community, due to the adjoining uses and the proximity of other <br /> <br />homes in the area. <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />