My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SEPT. 20, 1989
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
SEPT. 20, 1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:11 AM
Creation date
4/15/2003 9:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
1989-09-20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> <br />RE: Frank and Mary Lowery <br /> 439 Conduit Drive <br /> Mooresville, IN 46158 <br /> <br /> This matter came before the Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals on <br /> <br />September 20, 1989, at 7:00 P.M. at the Mooresville Town Hall. The petition <br />requested a variance to reduce the rear setback from 40 feet to zero feet <br />on a .06 acre tract and lot #20 of Marleywood Estates First Section. <br /> <br />The Board of Zoning Appeals having heard evidence on the above captioned <br />petition, now makes the following findings of fact pursuant to I.C. 36-7-4-918.5: <br /> <br /> 1. That the approval of this variance from the development standards <br /> <br />would not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and general <br />welfare of the community due to the size of the lot in question and due to the <br />size to the lot adjoining a state highway and the elimination of one of the <br />current structures on a .06 of an acre. <br /> <br /> 2. That the use and value of the area adjacent to the property included <br /> <br />in the variance would not be affected in any substantially adverse manner <br />since the proposed structure would actually enhance the property and eliminate <br />the older structure which is an eyesore. <br /> <br /> 3. That the strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance <br /> <br />would result in practical difficulties in the use of the property since <br /> <br /> the .06 acre tract could not be used for any structure and meet the town <br /> <br />zoning requirements. <br /> <br />Chairman <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.