Laserfiche WebLink
(1) That the approval would not be injuriousto the public <br />health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community in <br />that there were already similar types of uses in the area and the <br />type of business proposed would not be offensive. <br /> <br /> (2) That the use and value of the area adjacent to the <br />property included in the variance will not be affected in a <br />substantially adverse manner due to the other similar uses in the <br />area. <br /> <br />(3) That the need for the variance arises from some <br />condition peculiar to the property involved in that it is located <br /> <br />in an area zoned residential, however, <br />business uses which put limitations on <br />residential. <br /> <br />it is surrounded by other <br />the use of the property as <br /> <br /> (4) That the strict applications of the terms of the zoning <br />ordinance will constitute an unnecessary hardship if applied to <br />this property in that it will be difficult for the owner to use this <br />property strictly for residential purposes. <br /> <br /> (5) That the approval does not interfere substantially with <br />the comprehensive plan adopted by the Civil Town of Mooresville in <br />that this use is not out of place in the neighborhood with other <br />business uses and zoning being near this structure. <br /> <br />A motion was then made by Warren Franklin to approve the variance <br />and this was seconded by Don Barry and unanimously carried. <br /> <br /> The next petition to come before the board was filed by Joan <br />Fuller and William R. Fuller of 927 South Johnson Road, this is in <br />the buffer zone. Notices were found to be in order. The Fullers <br />were represented by Phillip R. Smith who proceeded to explain the <br />nature of the variance. Mr. Smith advised that the business in <br /> <br /> --2-- <br /> <br /> <br />