Laserfiche WebLink
this would be a problem. He also brought up potential water contamination <br />and the fact that none of the homes had capabilities to filter out any pollution <br />in their personal water supplies. <br /> <br /> Chairman Osc~man then opened up discussion to the Board. He commented on <br /> <br />the wet mining operation asking what the process would consist of. He was <br />advised that there would be a drag line operated by a gasoline engine and the <br />gravel would be taken out wet and taken away while it was still wet. Tilford <br />Bailey felt that many of their requirements still were not met. The Board then <br />entertained a motion. Paul Walters made a motion that the Board of Zoning Appeals <br />do an independent study on water problems in the area and property values and <br />take under advisement all matters with both parties being allowed to provide <br />information if they deem it necessary and to look to the Department of Natural <br />Resources and see the effect the operation would have if it were granted. This <br />was seconded and unanimously carried. <br /> <br /> Board Attorney then advised that no new notices would be sent out; however, <br />Mr. Kough and Mr. Lawson would be the contact parties for the Board and that any <br />new evidence to be presented would be at the next Board meeting at the public <br />meeting only with no disbursement of facts to Board members outside of the Board <br />meeting. <br /> <br /> The next item to come before the Board was a petition for a variance from <br /> <br />the development standards filed by Richard V. Pease and Alma J. Pease under <br />Variance No. 7-1984 at the address of 78 Sweetwood Drive, in particular to <br />have a variance from the minimum set-back required by the ordinance to place <br />a garage. Notices were found to be in order and the request was stated as a <br />rear set-back from 40 feet to 5 feet and a side set-back from 12 feet to 5 feet. <br />This was similar to all other garages in the areas and no remonstrators were <br />present. Wendell Thaler then made a motion to grant the variance as requested <br />stating that the statutory grounds and findings for a variance from the development <br />standards had been met. Paul Walters seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous. <br /> <br />-10- <br /> <br /> <br />