My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SEPT. 19, 1984
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
SEPT. 19, 1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:19 AM
Creation date
4/15/2003 9:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
1984-09-19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to the deeper aquifer and could polute the deeper aquifer which could effect <br />the well areas. He further stated that by taking the blanket of protection off <br />of the subterranean water, additional contamination problems could occur. <br />Wendell Thaler asked about the proximity of similar types of operation to the <br />Town's water supply system. He was advised that this could be a problem. <br /> <br /> Attorney Korn then again addressed the prevailing wind direction. In <br />particular the effects of the sand and gravel operation due to the wind. Dr. <br />Smtoskar said that even after a wet operation is completed, certain amounts of <br />dust and polution will blow across. He also advised that there was significant <br />amounts of wild life in the area which would be affected. <br /> <br /> Tom Kough then introduced Signe Nicholson of 24 Carol Lane and qualified <br />her as an expert city planner. Signe Nicholson then went on to explain the <br />Special Exception procedure within the ordinance. Attorney Dave Lawson objected <br />to the explanation stating that it was beyond the limits in scope of the evidence <br />which was to be covered at this second hearing. The Board told Mrs. Nicholson to <br />continue but to direct her cormments towards the issue of property values. She <br />then proceeded to explain significance of the proposed mining operation as it <br />pertains to the requirements to be met in the Special Exception ordinance section <br />of the Mooresville Zoning Ordinance found in Chapter 5, 1 through 6. <br /> <br /> She first said that Item 1 was not met in that the proposed use was a danger <br />to the water supply. She referred to the handout which was presented to the Board <br />as an exhibit. Attorney Dave Lawson objected to the use of the flood plain refer- <br />ences by the Morgan County Master Plan use. He stated that this was a misstatement <br />of the record and repetitive. The objection was so noted but the exhibit was <br />allowed to stand %n its own merits to be weighed for whatever value it might have, <br />since there were other exhibits within the document other than this all of the <br /> <br />-10- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.