OCT. 17, 1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

creek. It was also pointed out that the plant does not run at full capacity except during wet weather. · he Board then proceeded to review the findings of fact. Under Item 1, Steve Oschman stated that there was some question as to public health and safety brought out by potential infiltration contamination. He mdvised that there was evidence both ways and the decision came down to a risk factor in his estimation. Wendell Thaler felt that the treatment plant was self-contained preventing this problem and Tilford Bailey pointed out that contamination from runoff and farms could present a potential problem if the creek flooded on into the lake. Item 2, use and enjoyment of the surrounding properties was discussed with Tilford Bailey pointing out some of the problems other adjoining property owners had suffered near another gravel mining operation outside of the town. Paul Walters felt that this was true and would effect property values immediately with the possibility of increasing them after the mining operation had ceased and the lake was put in. Again, Steve 0schman stated that the Gaddis property would definitely be hurt from a property value point of view and use and enjoyment point of view also. Tilford Bailey believed that Willwood Manor property owners would be affected as to use and enjoyment raising the noise and dust factor along with property values declining. Paul Walters advised that he certainly would not want to live by this operation. Moving on to Item 3, the Board in general felt that the criteria was met. Looking at Item 4, they felt the items were met and under Item 5, that ingress and egress would be a problem along with traffic congestion on S.R. 67. The Board in general felt the requirements under Item 6 of the special exception requirements were met with the exceptions pointed out in the other aforementioned instances.