My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
OCT. 17, 1984
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
OCT. 17, 1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:18 AM
Creation date
4/15/2003 9:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
1984-10-17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Paul Walters then stated that he felt that requirements 2 and 5 at this time <br />were not met and Wendell Thaler stated that at lemst in his opinion Item 5 was <br />certainly not met. <br /> <br /> Chairman Oschman then stated to the Board that he would entertain a motion. <br />Wendell Thaler then stated that he would move the special exception be denied for <br />the reasons that Items 2 and 5 of the special exception requirements set out in <br />the Mooresville Zoning Ordinance under Chapter 5 - Special Exception Procedures, <br />had not been met based upon the earlier findings of the Board as discussed. <br /> <br />Paul Walters seconded this motion which unanimously carted 4 - 0. Warren Franklin <br />abstained from voting since he had not heard all of the testimony for the reason <br />that he was out of town at the one meeting where expert opinion was given. <br /> <br /> The Board then proceeded to the next item on the agenda, the petition for <br />a variance from the development standards, filed by Mooresville Federal Savings <br />& Loan on the property located at 24 Spring Mill Court to install a 3 1/2 foot X <br />8 foot identification sign, four feet from the curbing. Attorney Currens advised <br />that proper notices had been given and the affidavit of publication had been <br />provided. Tom Lloyd proceeded to present the request of the petitioners. The <br />Board questioned Mr. Lloyd about the sign and its location and after a review of <br />the development st~adards regarding the effect on the adjoining property owners <br />the other requirements, pursuant to Indiana Code 36-7-4-918.5, made a finding that <br />the variance would meet said standards. Paul Walters made a motion that the <br />variance request be granted as presented with Warren Franklin seconding the same <br />and the Board unanimously voting in favor of the variance. <br /> <br />The next item on the agenda was the variance request presented by Jerry L. <br />and Terri R. Taylor of 830 Edgewood Drive, Mooresville, Indiana. Attorney Currens <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.