Plan Commission 2014 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Young called for questions and or a motion, 13111 Colbert motioned for an approval, Virginia Perry seconded it and the motion passed 5-0 Holloway Engineering represented the Ragan family in their request to re plat 5 acres at 13036 N. Ragan Dr. The owners would like to divide and sell a portion of lot 1. Mike Young and Jeff Dieterlen stated that this proposal had been through technical review committee with no issues. Jeff Dieterlen questioned what would become of the property should the sale not occur as the property as requested does not have access and there for could not stand alone. John Larrison, for Holloway Engineering explained that the timing of all steps is intricate; the plat would not be recorded until all sales were complete, then Mr Maddox the new owner could/would record the property as one piece of merged property. .leff Dieterlen made a motion to pass on the contingency that the sale, filing and recording happened as stated. The motion passed. Ross Holloway presented a PUD amendment to Ordinance 10 — 1999. Ross Holloway presented an overview of the previously approved ordinance to the Commission members and the audience. Ross went on to explain that the current plans would reduce the approved 7duplex condominiums to 13 single family homes. Mr. Holloway explained that this is a decrease in the possible number of residents and traffic, and that it would create more impervious ground. The retention areas would be addressed, a berm would be constructed, landscaping would be planted and studies had been completed regarding the creek behind the property, The covenant and restrictions on this proposed project are different, all homes are at least 2 bedrooms, 12 pitch roof, there will be a board, homeowners association and the existing lift station will remain and maintained by the homeowners association. Ross Holloway showed graphs that illustrate this project will not increase standing water; water will flow into the stream. Ross Holloway and Tim Currens discuss the previously approved plans for run off did not include the current storm water ordinance, Mike Young opened the floor for questions: Kim Sweeney questioned the need for a homeowners association, she was worried that residents could be violated for not conforming. Floyd Duncan from Indiana St asked for clarification of water flow, Ross Holloway reiterated that if water flow did not meet current standards and studies, by a third party engineering company that no building permits would he issued. Ross Holloway stated that he would mow and clean up his portion of the creek to assist with the water flow. Audience members did not seem convinced that constructing in that arca would assist in the problem, Mr. Holloway once again reminded the audience that what he was asking in the plan Commission for was an amendment that plans had already been approved previously to allow building in that area, Mr. Burnside, a neighbor addressed the driveway size and how increasing the width would reduce the area his renters use for parking and their privacy would he decreased. Mr. Holloway explained that increasing the drive would still provide Mr. burnsides property with 12 feet of property to the fence. Audience member mark Mathis of East St expressed concern with water flow as well, he also stated concerns that as there is no proposed play area residents of this development may in cringe upon his adjoining property. Ross Holloway agreed to put up a privacy fence up