My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
November 2003
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
November 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 11:38:13 AM
Creation date
5/22/2018 11:38:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
coming out of that development. She asked if the old house was coming down and Mr. <br />Holloway answered just the old house, the other one was staying. She asked if they felt if most <br />of the traffic would go out on Bridge Street, and he said there would be no reason for them to <br />come out on Hadley Road, because most of the businesses are on Bridge Street. <br />Margaret McGovern, Indiana Real Estate Group, representing the Crafton family, of the <br />commercial lots that would be restricted to possible uses, asked if the developers could sell <br />commercial lots to another developer who will build whatever the structure is. Mr. Holloway <br />said that could be, but the restrictions are whoever builds them would have to be compatible with <br />the developers. She asked if the lots were sold to someone else, how would those restrictions be <br />transferred? Mr. Holloway said they would be platted lots within this development and the <br />covenants and restrictions that go along with this development would go along with these lots. <br />Mrs. Lasiter asked what if everybody wants the same style of house and Mr. Young said the <br />developer would not let that happen, because that would stifle the future sale of his homes. Mr. <br />Holloway said their intension was to have a mix of homes, they don't want them to all look alike. <br />Mr. Young asked if they would ask for an extension and come back next month with the things <br />in writing that the board is looking at to be voted on? Mr. Holloway asked Ms. McGovern if an <br />extension was needed and she said there would have to be an extension. Mr. Young said that <br />one of the things this board is looking at is not approving something the first time it comes <br />before them. Commissioner Ehrhart said he would like to go to Carmel and look at that <br />development. Mr. Beikman stated that they were voting on a rezone and not the plat, Mr. Young <br />said they would like all the things answered before they vote on the rezone. Mr. Bryant said he <br />would rather wait. <br />Commissioner McGuire asked about sidewalks on Bridge Street and Mr. Holloway said there <br />would be sidewalks on their side. <br />Commissioner Bryant stated the trees in Roberson Woods, spacing of the trees were fifteen feet <br />apart and that was too close. He would like to have one per lot in this development. <br />Mr. Holloway stated they were willing to come back and the would have three landscaping <br />plans, one for a typical lot, one for the entrance with the sign drawn in and then a typical median <br />section. <br />Mr. Young said at the next meeting they would like to have the landscaping plans, covenants and <br />restrictions, the issue with Postal department cleared up, and in the covenants the percentage of <br />homes to be occupied before the homeowners association would be in place. <br />Motion was made to continue the petition for Hopkins and Crafton until December 11, 2003 <br />following the Board of Zoning Appeals, by Commissioner Ehrhart, second by Commissioner <br />Crouch. Motion carried 7-0. <br />Next Mr. Holloway representing the Mooresville Public Library Board, requested a rezone of <br />lots 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 and a large meets and bounds parcel north, the Jessup property, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.