Laserfiche WebLink
Mooresville Planning Commission, March 11, 2021 <br />structure. Mr. Dieterlen asked where drainage from Lot2B would flow. Mr. Larrison stated that Lot213 is the top <br />end of the a watershed, and that property to the north is a lower property. The expense to maintain that drainage <br />is the sole responsibility of the owner of Lot2B. There will be field pipe drainage for the septic field. Mr. <br />Dieterlen called for a motion and Perry King made a motion to approve. Robert Allenbaugh seconded the motion <br />and the vote to approve was unanimous. <br />Steve Brehob of Banning Engineering presented an amendment to the Sugarwood plat, specifically Lot 4. He <br />presented arial footage of the Grace Church property with church, parking lot and rectory. He stated that none of <br />these structures are currently on the Sugarwood plat. The Church wishes to move the lot line of Lot 4 plat to <br />encompass the church and the parking lot onto the Sugarwood plat for the purposes of financing and the sale of <br />the former rectory, as well as improvements to the church and buildings on the lot. Mark Taylor asked if a septic <br />field crossed the proposed lines and Mr. Brehob responded no. He pointed out that the area to the east of the <br />rectory encompasses the septic and water. Mr. Taylor asked if septic and water for the rectory was separate from <br />utilities for the church, and Mr. Brehob clarified that yes, they are. Jeff Dieterlen asked if the drive shown on the <br />aerial photo going past the rectory is an access lane to the back of the Church property. Mr. Brehob stated that the <br />property line for the plat amendment would be to the east of the drive and there would be no need for cross -access <br />for the two structures as the barn could be accessed from the Church parking lot, thus the lane to the barn would <br />be removed. Mr. Dieterlen clarified that the rectory has no facilities or utilities that are part of the Church <br />responsibility. He also asked if either of the parcels are a part of the Sugarwood subdivision, and if there are any <br />covenants and restrictions for the subdivision. Mr. Brehob responded that the Church and parking lot are on Lot 4 <br />and not a part of the residential subdivision to the east, but he did not know if there were any covenants or <br />restrictions for the subdivision. Mr. Dieterlen further clarified by asking "Is the statement that there are no <br />covenants and restrictions for Lot 4 accurate?" and Mr. Brehob agreed it was accurate. Mr. Dieterlen called for a <br />motion for approval or disapproval. Josh Brown motioned to approve, Robert Allenbaugh seconded and the vote <br />to approve was unanimous. <br />Ross Holloway of Holloway Engineering requested rezoning of the property at County Line Road and Ferguson <br />Road from I1 to RID. He described a proposed plat of 73 home lots of 10,000 square feet which met all <br />requirements for RID except a variance requested for a 30 -foot setback. On the west side of Ferguson and on <br />County Line Road are all RI D type homes. The area north of requested rezoning area is commercial. There was <br />a concern from the Tech Committee that the area might be better used as a commercial zone. 12 would be <br />inappropriate as the surrounding areas are also residential. Homes to the west on Ferguson are the epitome of <br />starter homes with an average of 1,300 square feet. Homes to be developed on the rezoned property would be <br />quite a bit larger. We will present a plat if zoning is approved by the Town Council. Jeff Dieterlen asked when <br />the property was zoned I1. John Larrison responded that the owner's transmission shop was built 30 years ago, <br />and he plans to expand to the east. Ross Holloway added that there is agricultural zoning to the east, 11 to the <br />north, residential to the west John Larrison added that there are still 7 to 10 acres of undeveloped property on <br />County Line zoned I1. Mark Taylor asked about traffic planning for 150-300 cars. Mr. Holloway responded that <br />when his firm brings back a plat for review, the Planning Commission can request a traffic study. He stated that <br />he had reached out to the County Engineer, but he had been deployed to Iraq. Mark Taylor pointed out that there <br />was only one entrance/exit from the preliminary plat, and Mr. Holloway stated that a requested traffic study <br />would address this as well as any Fire and Emergency concerns. He pointed out that Mooresville sewers were <br />along the north side of the property, made the prediction that in the not too distant future the parcel may be <br />annexed. Jeff Dieterlen opened discussion for public comment and Sharon Tirey of Keller Williams Realty <br />presented a petition with signatures from five of the eighteen residents of neighboring properties, stating that they <br />