My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
JUNE 28, 1990
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
JUNE 28, 1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:12:55 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 11:50:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Commission
NAME
JUNE 28, 1990
Plan Commission - Type
Minutes
DATE
1990-06-28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />'-- <br /> <br />'-- <br /> <br />'-- <br /> <br />and bonding. Mr. Stafford advised that the Building Inspector had <br /> <br /> <br />reviewed the drawings and also had the figures for bonding <br /> <br /> <br />requirements. Robert Tucker then moved for primary approval <br /> <br /> <br />subject to bonding and specification approval of the Building <br /> <br /> <br />Inspector. This was seconded by Joel Beebe and passed by vote of <br /> <br /> <br />9 in favor and 0 opposed. The Board's Attorney advised that this <br /> <br /> <br />plat could be recorded after the Building Inspector had signed off <br /> <br /> <br />on the specifications and proper bonding was filed with the Town. <br /> <br /> <br />He advised that the Secretary and Chairperson of the Plan <br /> <br /> <br />Commission could execute the plat after these requirements were <br /> <br /> <br />met. <br /> <br />The next item on the agenda was the Remster rezoning. The <br /> <br /> <br />Board's Attorney advised that no notices had been received and <br /> <br /> <br />this matter was tabled. <br /> <br /> <br />David Stafford of 19 East Main Street then addressed the <br /> <br /> <br />Board with written questions to the Plan Commission. Signe <br /> <br /> <br />Nicholson questioned what the Plan Commission does in this type of <br /> <br /> <br />situation. The Board's Attorney advised that the Plan Commission <br /> <br /> <br />should review the questions submitted and make a determination of <br /> <br /> <br />whether or not they wanted to respond, table the matter, or if the <br /> <br /> <br />questions were properly addressed to this Board. The Board's <br /> <br /> <br />Attorney advised that in a brief reading of the questionnaire some <br /> <br /> <br />of the questions were probably more appropriately addressed to the <br /> <br /> <br />Redevelopment Commission. Mr. Stafford responded that since this <br /> <br /> <br />was the first unit of government to approve or disapprove the <br /> <br /> <br />Redevelopment Plan, they should respond. The Board's Attorney <br /> <br /> <br />advised that they were not the first unit of government to approve <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.