JUNE 28, 1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ ~ '- . or disapprove the plan since the Redevelopment Commission acted upon it first and, basically, the Plan Commission's determination was whether or not the Resolution and Redevelopment Plan conformed to the plan of development for the Town of Mooresville and their approval or disapproval of the Resolution and Plan was directed towards this issue primarily. William Abbott questioned who Mr. Stafford represented. He advised that he represented himself as a property owner in the TIF district. Mr. Abbott advised that the questions submitted should be directed to the Redevelopment Plan. Mr. Stafford then responded that the reason he was here was because he feels the Plan Commission acted improperly in approving the Plan since no Master Land Use Plan had been passed and the public hearing still had not been held. The Board's Attorney advised that the Plan Commission based its decision on the Resolution and Redevelopment Plan conforming to the plan of development for the Town of Mooresville, not necessarily to any existing or proposed Master Land Use Plan. The Board was then polled as to the whether or not to proceed with answering these questions, and the responses were as follows: William Abbott chose not to address the issues, Robert Tucker stated that he felt the questions were directed to the wrong body and didn't feel he wanted to respond this evening, Dave Minardo said no, Vern Kimmel stated he had no comment to make, Joel Beebe stated he did not choose to comment on these at this time, Dave Barry felt that proceduraly this matter should go to the Redevelopment Commission, Shirley Welker stated that everyone knows how she had voted and where she stood on this issue. Chairperson Nicholson stated that -6-