JAN. 25, 1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

have been due to the need for the commercial use to be established to help support the financing on the balance of the construction. - Mark Mathis, of 133 Northeast Street, stated that he knew Mr. Raymond and felt that he would do everything that he had stated he '- ~ would do. Bill Abbott then questioned the Board's Attorney as to what issues were currently before the Board. The Attorney advised that the rezoning issues were initially before the Board and plat approval would be looked at after this portion had been concluded. Floyd Duncan then spoke and stated that he wanted to keep the area residential. Signe Nicholson spoke on behalf of her husband, Phil Nicholson, one of the property owners at 203 North Indiana Street. Mr. Nicholson's concerns were based upon drainage problems that would be created with any type of intensive land use placed downstream from their property. Harold Nance of 117 East Hadley Street then stated he wanted the property to stay as a residential and further stated that drainage is a problem. Elby Miller of Washington Street had questions concerning noise from the music studio. Mr. House stated that the recording studio would be soundproof out of necessity. In particular, to have a good recording studio you needed to keep all outside sounds from coming in, which, likewise, keeps inside sounds from going out. The Board then proceeded with a discussion of the proposed rezoning. Signe Nicholson questioned the Board's Attorney concerning the restrictions referred to. Attorney Currens advised that his interpretation of Indiana Code 36-7-4-613 required the rezoning to be filed as a planned unit development before any types of restrictions could be placed upon the rezoning. He then -3-