My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SEPTEMBER 25, 2003
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
SEPTEMBER 25, 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:13:57 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 11:50:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Commission
NAME
SEPTEMBER 25, 2003
Plan Commission - Type
Minutes
DATE
2003-09-25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />divide off the Marathon Station as it is being sold. A variance had been granted for <br />setbacks between the building to the west. The entire paved area is access and they need <br />to label the right of way line (a 40 foot strip). Commissioner Bryant asked if where the <br />diagram said Lot 2, that isn't Lot 2 is it because the whole entire remainder of the area <br />would be Lot 2. Mr. Holloway said there was no Lot 2 the 56 by 86 little square is a <br />canopy area. A motion was made by Commissioner Bryant, a second by Commissioner <br />Crouch to approve the minor plat. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> <br />Next, Ross Holloway presented a two lot minor plat for Lot 22 in Flagstaff Business Park <br />for Flag I, LLC. The lots will be 22A and 22B. Lot 22A is 1.59 acres and Lot 22B is <br />1.54 acres. They front on Highway 67 and have a 4O-foot wide access for maintenance. <br />The docks will be on the side next to Poe's Cafeteria. The second request is for a site <br />plan approval. The use is a spec building with 8,000 square feet of warehouse and 2,250 <br />square feet of office space with ground level loading docks. A motion was made by <br />Commissioner McGuire, with a second by Commissioner Bruner to approve the two lot <br />re-plat of Lot 22. Motion carried 6-0. Commissioner Williamson had just entered the <br />meeting and he abstained. A motion was made by Commissioner Bruner, a second by <br />Commissioner Crouch to approve the site plan as proposed. Motion carried 7-0. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mcguire stated he would like to withdraw the motion for continuance for <br />the rezone of Lots 3 & 4 from Residential to B-3 because Commissioner Williamson had <br />appeared and he had not heard the request. President Young asked if any of the <br />commissioners objected. No one did. So, Ross Holloway re-capped the presentation. <br />Commissioner Bryant said that nightclubs and taverns were in B-3 but not in B-2. <br />Commissioner Williamson asked why a B-3 and not a B-2 request. Ross Holloway said <br />because of building size and easier financial obtainment. He told the commission the lots <br />sizes were the same as Red Barrel. A motion was made by Commissioner Williamson, a <br />second by Commissioner Bruner to give a favorable recommendation to the Town <br />Council with stipulation of restrictions that there can be no taverns and no nightclubs. <br />Commissioner Bryant stated he could go for that type of motion. Motion carried 7 -0. <br /> <br />Town attorney Tim Currens told the commission they needed to review the <br />Comprehensive Plan as a board and if satisfied they needed to advertise as a Public <br />Hearing and have the Comprehensive Plan in the Clerk-Treasurer's office for people to <br />view. <br /> <br />Commissioner Crouch wanted everyone to look on page 18, Business and Industry, <br />Policy 1 and 7, he said were almost identical and he thought one should be removed. <br />Town attorney Tim Currens said they really were different. In Policy I utilities are a goal <br />to be extended to business and industry and in Policy 7 they are saying this is where we <br />want you located. <br /> <br />Commissioner Crouch pointed to Traffic and Circulation, Policy I and stated they had <br />always had this problem with traffic. The Jessup property on Hadley Road did not get <br />approved because of traffic. He said he had observed there seems to be a push to widen <br />county roads and is this the proper place to put this information. Attorney Tim Currens <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.