My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
TC 2004
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Town Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
TC 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2008 12:51:47 PM
Creation date
12/30/2008 12:51:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Clerk Treas
DATE
2008-12-30
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'~~~ <br />The Town Council sign previously approved Ordinance #10, Storm water Fee Schedule, <br />and Ordinance #10B, Storm water Ordinance. <br />Next the Town Council discussed a letter from Mr. Stegman, Roberson Woods <br />Association, concerning trees planted in their planting strips. The homeowners planted <br />the trees in our right of way without permission. Naw the trees have matured and the <br />limbs extend well into the streets and over sidewalks, and several have grown around <br />streetlights obscuring any illumination. And some sidewalk sections require work. The <br />Association wants to know if the Town has any responsibility, assumed or documented, <br />relative to trimming tree limbs either in streets, over sidewalks, or both and if the Town <br />has same regarding sidewalks. If the Town does not have the responsibility, they request <br />the Town's recommendations as to how they should proceed in dealing with problems <br />located on property (easements) that homeowners legally do not own. Attorney Currens <br />said the council could tell them the Town could take responsibility for the tree trimming <br />or say you didn't have permission to do it or we could have them removed. Councilman <br />Bryant said we don't have a current ordinance dealing with trees. They have too many <br />trees. They are 15 feet apart instead of 30 feet and need to be trimmed. Councilman <br />Bryant said he thought they ought to put it back to them to trim up the lower limbs and he <br />wasn't sure what Mr. Stegman meant concerning the sidewalk repairs because he has <br />walked every sidewalk in the addition and there couldn't be any more than a slight <br />elevation change between the flags. He wouldn't want to go in there in tear all the trees <br />out. <br />Council President Worthen said he had been asked to attend the Homeowner's <br />Association meeting an Thursday night and would like a consensus of the council to take <br />to the meeting. Councilman Shields said there was the same problem in Roberson <br />Village and .asked if there was an ordinance concerning trees and visibility of traffic. <br />Attorney Currens said we did have an ordinance about trees obstructing traffic visibility. <br />You may want to address by ordinance the type of tree to be planted and some request <br />before it is planted as to area so as not to obstruct traffic, and even how far apart to plant <br />the trees. Councilman Bryant said he would like to have this type of ordinance and <br />maybe give them five types" of trees they could plant, the spacing (depending on size of <br />lot), or number of feet between them. Councilman Bryant said he thought the <br />Association should take care of the problem they created or the alternative is the Town <br />remove a portion of the trees. He said the Town does bear some of the responsibility if <br />the trees are causing a problem with the sidewalks or traffic. The Town does have the <br />right to remove them. Councilman Shields said he would like to be able to identify if this <br />is a problem the Association has not been able to agree on. If this is an action between a <br />few homeowners, then the Association needs to deal with this first. Attorney Currens <br />said maybe what both Councilmen were saying is these folks chose to plant on the <br />Town's property and then if they want the Town to maintain them, they may not be <br />maintained in a way in which they find desirable. Consensus: Find out first if this is a <br />problem the Association hasn't been able to solve and if it the Tawn can come in and <br />trim them and remove them because our goal is to keep the beauty the trees provide yet <br />we don't want them to be a continual maintenance problem year after year. Councilman <br />Shields added he wants to make sure that the Town is not inviting themselves to maintain <br />everyone's landscaping they plant on Town property. They ought to be encouraged to <br />take care of the trees themselves. <br />This discussion led to the Downtown trees. Councilman Bryant said the trees were <br />planted to help enhance the Downtown business area and to add charm and character. <br />They sought the advice of an arborist from Purdue University, but the trees have not been <br />maintained regularly. Some of the businesses have expressed their concern the trees <br />block their signage and storefronts. Councilman Bryant thinks the trees are the Town's <br />responsibility and not the Revitalization Committee. This situation is different than <br />Roberson Woods because the Town gave the Revitalization Committee permission to <br />plant the trees and the Town did not give Roberson Woods permission to plant their trees. <br />Town attorney Tim Currens said the planting of the trees downtown was part of an <br />overall Downtown Beautification Plan. Council President Worthen asked if the Town <br />should look at removing these trees and replacing with a tree that is not going to grow as <br />big as these trees have grown. Councilman Bryant said this is probably the wise choice <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.