PC 2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

questioned if utilities were on the property. Mr. Bray indicated there was possibly sewer but not water to the best of his knowledge. Commissioner Brown questioned if the change was made to B3 would this later limit any use uld have no would then be transferable. Attorney Tim Currens stated that B d remain any limits, all B3 options would then become available, the rezone would special exception would stay with the current property owners requesting it now. Commissioner Young opened the floor to questions. Commissioners Dieterlen and Brown both had questions regarding traffic flow, property entrance State Road 67 Commissioner King made mention of the U turn now caflaolWab�r an auto dealership and Hadley Rd. Mr. Bray spoke again of steady traffic rather than times of day for higher traffic flow as with other types o when this request s. Commissioner Young stated that he was on the plan Commission was heard in 2002 and one of the concerns then was if it was conducive to the Master Plan as it is a gateway into the community. Commissioner King stated the that the comprehensive plans had been updated since 2002 and that he believed gateways into the community did not include this particular location / intersection. Commissioner Brown and Commissioner Dieterlen believe this intersection to be a gateway, Mr. Bray stated in his research he did not think it was. Commissioner Dieterlen read a section of the comprehensive plan, a section discussing th b gateways and what may best fit in with the overall plans. Concern stated y Commissioner Dieterlen that B2 works well with an area near residential at sections vs a B3 that is more geared toward larger commercial businesses an must be a reason an auto lot is a B3. Mr. Bray states that this would be a State Road 67 project and or business and that the commission should d 6 m e their rather than recommendation based on other local businesses along State Road thinking of it as a State Road 67 and State Road 144 intersection project,, as lr. and Mrs. Remster only wish to use the one parcel of land for the auto Commision members questioned what would become of the second plot, Mr. Bray was unaware of his clients future possible use of the property. Commissioner Brown again questioned the traffic flow, a U turn at Hadley Road only 1 helped in one direction, possible illegal U turns at 144 could increase or use o businesses for turning around could become an issue. Mr. Bray stated that traffic could be an issue for any business that would occupy that piece of property. Commissioner King mentioned a church that previously approved with no regards to additional traffic flow. Commissioner made a motion to approve or recommend,